Weceem 0.8 Released – Highlights and background
I’ve just managed to push out version 0.8 of the Weceem CMS for Grails.
This is a pretty cool if slightly unglamourous release because it has focussed on some performance and security stuff – oh and compatibility with the latest and greatest Grails 1.2.0 release.
Let me first apologise for the ropey typography on weceem.org – we haven’t yet had the time/resources to fix up the CSS styles so things are a little ugly in places. We will fix it as soon as we get time!
Anyway, we added a security policy. This is a groovy script (currently only loaded once at startup) that lets you define what different users can do. This uses a DSL that lets you declare roles and then say what they can do in different spaces, including whether they can admin the space, edit/view/delete/create content, and even do this by URI requested. (see more info and example here)
Because we believe strongly that Weceem should not force you to use a particular authentication library, we had to decouple the policy mechanism from authentication. As a result these roles are completely uninterpreted by Weceem. To integrate and authentication system all you have to be able to do is provide the name, email, login and list of roles for the currently logged-in user. (an example here)
This has enabled some cool stuff in WeceemSecurityService which relies on the security policy. The service has utility methods for implementing our security logic, e.g. isUserAllowedToViewContent(Content c). For example in previous versions of Weceem you could not preview content if it was not in a publicContent status (eg not Published).
Thankfully from version 0.8, anybody who has the EDIT permission can view non-published content. the default security policy ensures that the default administrator account has EDIT permission, so you can preview away as much as you like. We plan future updates to this to allow the security policy to control who can manipulate different types of content, which will be really powerful for people using custom content types.
On the performance front, it became obvious that something needed to be done because the default “index” page installed by Weceem into new spaces was resulting in huge amounts of SQL queries for a single page.
This is because the page is made up like this:
- It pulls in a Template node for the styling
- It pulls in three Widgets for reusable HEAD section tags and header and footer
- The header widget iterates over all root content nodes and their children to render the menu with the wcm:menu tag
- The page itself links to various StyleSheet and JavaScript nodes to pull in styling and scripts – these are processed on separate requests but still add to the overall burden of the page
This can result in a lot of SQL chatter because we have (rightly so) made no effort to optimize this until now.
There are a couple of areas here that would make a big difference to the SQL traffic.
It is very important to realise that turning on the 2nd level cache in your Grails app’s GORM configuration does not magically give you major performance improvements. My understanding of this rather complex area (which frankly I found very disappointing) is:
- The 2nd level cache is only used for retrieval by object id. This is very important
- The query caches are used to cache the ids of objects returned for a given query
- Query caches are invalidated frequently by Hibernate if your model is not primarily read-only (and can cause some threading contention)
Luckily a CMS is pretty read-only in terms of number of requests that actually read vs update content, so the 2nd level cache is a good candidate for us here.
One of the major SQL hits for Weceem is resolving a URI to the ultimate content node to render. Due to the model we need to query for each part of the URI, so a request for /a/b/c results in three selects. So that’s an easy one – we added URI path -> content id caching (and some other smarts) into the ContentRepositoryService. So once content has been hit, it will always be retrieved by id in future, via the 2nd level cache.
Another issue is iterating over child nodes. This is less trivial. We are using some query caching but I have noticed that some of the criteria were not hitting the caches despite this – it needs further investigation. I think that due to the polymorphic nature of the content model and query cache invalidation issues, we may stop using these in future (think blog comments being submitted and invalidating ALL your caches).
Next up: Template and Widget nodes are GSP pages that we compile and evaluate. It turned out that due to issues in Grails GSP handling (that persist in 1.2 to my knowledge), there is no internal caching of compiled GSP classes built from non-Resource content e.g. strings. This results in a leak of PermGen space which ultimately results in VM collapse. So we now have a simple cache of compiled Template and Widget GSP pages, which is automatically invalidated as necessary when templates and widgets are edited, so it is transparent to the end user that there is a cache.
Finally with regard to performance, we introduced a nice simple wcm:cache tag. This lets you cache fragments of a Template/Widget and hence get major performance improvements. The cache is currently fixed at 1 hour, but its great for anything that pulls in remote content or for any expensive node iteration tags you might be using. More enhancements will come in future.
A couple of nice little things we squeezed in:
- The Cancel button is back on the content editor screen, in the “right” place for Windows users (meh) and browsers (who made return always select the first button argh!)
- The wcm:link tag now passes through any unused attributes eg class=”whatever”
- We added a JS syntax highlighting script to the default space that you can use to render code snippets in your content easily
Anyway, please enjoy this release. Soon time to get started on 0.9 which should see the Blog functionality completed and other refinements.





















4 Comments
Andreas Steffan
January 14, 2010Hallo Marc,
I guess I definitely need a CMS solution for an existing grails (1.2) based app as major content changes (in three languages) are coming up (SEO/SEM project). I would point you to the site here if I could
#competition.
I hope I’ll find the time to try it out next week. I have a little experience with Alfresco and other “legacy” CMSs. Regarding the project in mind – weceem definitely is the first (and hopefully last as well) system I’ll try as its grails based.
Thanks so far
Andreas
Marc Palmer
January 15, 2010Cool let me know if you need any assistance, and remember the forums at forums.jcatalog.com
Andrew
February 4, 2010Do you realize in this article the word cache is used 15 times? Don’t cover your performance problems with fat caches.
Marc Palmer
February 7, 2010Andrew – we’re not covering anything. Until 0.8 Weceem has zero caching of any kind, not even hibernate level 2 caching. Caching of the database data is very important with apps that hit the database so much. Weceem invalidates the corresponding cache entries when content is edited.
It also provides the cache tag because this is a real end-user requirement for caching remote content, or to deal with expensive queries related to hierarchical traversals (eg nested menus).
There are no “fat” caches.